H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Zhizhen Zhang vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 1-0
Zhizhen Zhang holds a 1–0 lead over Rogerio Dutra Silva in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zhizhen Zhang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zhizhen Zhang won the 2017 Shenzhen third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Zhizhen Zhang | 6-4 6-1 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zhizhen Zhang | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |