H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Adriana Villagran Reami vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-3
Kathy Horvath holds a 3–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1988 Berlin second round 6-4 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1988* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1988* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-3 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Kathy Horvath | 6-4 6-4 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Adriana Villagran Reami | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |