H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Agnes Szavay vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 0-2
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–0 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2008 Paris final 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2008* | Paris | WTA 500 | F | Carpet | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| May 30, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-4 6-7(1) 6-4 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnes Szavay | Anna Chakvetadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 |