H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-0

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Aleksandra Krunic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2016 Shenzhen round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnieszka Radwanska #5 6-4 6-3 Aleksandra Krunic #108 Match data Jan 7, 2016* R32 Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,103 513 241 68.0% 0 5 1 7 7 20
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,771 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Aleksandra Krunic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,809 0 1 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 2008 52–20 72.2% #10 1,914 0 4 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,912 0 4 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,862 0 4 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,523 0 0
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,980 0 7 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,543 0 0
23 2012 59–20 74.7% #4 1,988 0 10 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,966 0 13 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,753 0 1
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,877 0 14 2018 20–23 46.5% #55 1,713 0 2
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,961 0 17 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,556 0 2
27 2016 53–19 73.6% #3 1,980 0 20 — — — — — — —
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,823 0 20 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,643 0 2
29 2018 15–14 51.7% #74 1,752 0 20 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,635 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,603 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,565 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Aleksandra Krunic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 18 10 28 64.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2008 30 14 44 68.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 28 16 44 63.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 25 12 37 67.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 36 12 48 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2012 41 13 54 75.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2013 46 15 61 75.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 31 16 47 66.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 8 15 23 34.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2015 36 16 52 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2016 43 13 56 76.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2018 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 370 166 536 69.0% 75 45 120 62.5% 66 28 94 70.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — 41 69 110 37.3% 33 39 72 45.8% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's and 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 10/19 1.8 1.6 65.4% 59.8% 46.5% 60.6% 47.1% 55.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 41/46 2.0 1.8 60.6% 62.9% 47.7% 57.5% 43.5% 57.3% 44.3% 2011 2/4 3.0 1.0 64.4% 78.7% 70.1% 50.0% 58.3% 75.8% 52.6%
19 2008 59/72 1.4 1.4 67.0% 63.2% 46.8% 50.4% 54.4% 57.9% 49.2% 2012 3/3 2.0 6.3 48.1% 63.1% 40.4% 51.5% 68.5% 51.0% 50.8%
20 2009 64/67 1.5 1.5 66.3% 62.9% 48.9% 52.1% 56.0% 58.2% 48.9% 2013 4/4 1.3 4.5 48.9% 59.7% 50.2% 45.6% 42.5% 54.7% 42.6%
21 2010 49/50 1.6 1.2 65.6% 64.1% 50.5% 51.5% 47.9% 59.2% 48.8% 2014 9/11 3.2 4.1 56.7% 64.0% 45.1% 44.4% 49.5% 55.7% 39.9%
22 2011 56/64 2.3 1.2 67.1% 64.4% 51.4% 58.4% 54.0% 59.9% 49.6% 2015 23/31 2.6 2.6 57.1% 60.9% 48.4% 49.1% 45.7% 54.9% 37.5%
23 2012 68/79 2.4 1.2 67.3% 66.3% 46.7% 56.9% 56.1% 59.9% 49.0% 2016 15/16 1.3 2.3 63.0% 58.0% 43.8% 35.6% 38.2% 52.8% 42.1%
24 2013 69/76 2.4 1.6 64.9% 65.6% 50.7% 55.0% 53.1% 60.4% 48.1% 2017 32/33 2.2 1.9 63.6% 64.5% 50.3% 51.1% 51.6% 59.5% 48.5%
25 2014 60/65 2.4 1.3 65.5% 63.3% 48.2% 56.8% 52.0% 58.2% 49.8% 2018 40/43 1.6 2.2 63.4% 61.4% 49.2% 52.9% 39.9% 56.5% 43.2%
26 2015 49/72 2.5 1.3 66.7% 68.4% 51.3% 56.8% 54.6% 62.7% 46.7% 2019 19/19 1.1 2.1 63.0% 56.1% 47.8% 53.8% 36.9% 52.9% 39.4%
27 2016 60/73 2.8 1.8 62.4% 67.3% 47.7% 60.1% 57.3% 60.0% 49.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 42/43 2.0 1.6 61.8% 64.9% 45.8% 53.6% 46.7% 57.5% 46.3% 2021 12/12 2.0 1.5 57.1% 64.4% 50.9% 42.3% 67.7% 58.8% 44.0%
29 2018 24/29 1.4 1.9 60.8% 59.8% 44.2% 45.6% 42.6% 53.4% 43.2% 2022 19/19 1.8 2.7 58.8% 62.4% 50.4% 58.2% 48.6% 57.7% 44.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 9/9 1.8 2.6 61.6% 55.9% 46.5% 47.2% 47.4% 52.4% 40.9%
Career — 651/755 2.1 1.5 65.1% 64.6% 48.5% 55.1% 52.4% 59.0% 48.2% — 187/207 1.9 2.4 60.8% 61.4% 48.7% 49.8% 46.4% 56.3% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1673 141.6 +0.60 +1.54 1.026 50.8% -31 -111 +25 58.1% +0.40 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.3 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1810 145.1 +1.25 +1.05 1.037 50.9% -9 -215 -55 57.7% +0.58 8–8 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -0.85 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — — +0.40
19 2008 1914 152.0 +2.51 +4.81 1.167 53.4% -49 -105 +11 66.0% +1.18 14–7 (67%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.97 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
20 2009 1913 151.3 +2.63 +4.78 1.172 53.5% -27 -59 +42 62.8% +0.99 11–9 (55%) 4–10 (29%) 92.8 +1.49 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.48
21 2010 1862 156.5 +3.54 +5.02 1.197 53.9% +37 -47 +77 66.0% +1.38 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 91.3 +2.07 2014 1524 119.6 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +2 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.31
22 2011 1980 161.2 +4.42 +6.19 1.237 54.8% +22 -148 -85 67.3% +1.27 12–11 (52%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 +2.26 2015 1543 109.3 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -23 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.3 +0.06
23 2012 1989 163.4 +4.85 +5.61 1.223 54.4% +44 -42 -81 72.4% +1.53 11–7 (61%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.14 2016 1595 118.6 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +15 +43 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 — -1.00
24 2013 1966 161.1 +5.04 +4.68 1.217 54.2% +44 -43 -7 70.9% +1.54 10–5 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 103.6 +1.71 2017 1753 130.9 +2.13 +3.51 1.197 53.9% -68 +21 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.88
25 2014 1877 160.3 +2.22 +5.84 1.190 53.9% +20 +68 +42 63.6% +1.24 8–7 (53%) 7–5 (58%) 99.1 +1.73 2018 1714 131.0 -0.44 -0.20 0.992 49.5% -69 +26 +49 44.3% -0.43 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 -0.57
26 2015 1962 156.6 +4.09 +5.26 1.249 54.7% +2 -94 -3 67.3% +1.52 9–13 (41%) 3–6 (33%) 90.4 -0.24 2019 1557 107.2 -2.43 -3.32 0.836 46.4% -17 +146 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.16
27 2016 1980 161.7 +4.05 +6.47 1.245 54.9% +48 -113 -53 72.2% +1.73 8–10 (44%) 8–6 (57%) 94.0 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1823 139.7 +1.38 +2.93 1.090 51.9% +30 +27 +110 57.7% +0.56 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 +1.52 2021 1644 126.9 +1.13 +0.71 1.067 51.3% -4 +67 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
29 2018 1752 134.0 -1.95 +0.83 0.927 48.2% +14 — +160 47.6% -0.17 7–2 (78%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 -0.80 2022 1635 120.3 +0.48 +1.43 1.042 50.8% -31 +63 +22 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1633 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1604 109.4 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -21 — +83 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 106.9 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1551 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2104 161.3 +3.16 +4.74 1.175 53.6% +16 -74 +8 65.6% +1.20 107–96 (53%) 70–61 (53%) 95.2 +1.29 — 1772 124.4 -0.34 -0.21 0.983 49.6% -39 +40 +64 42.5% -0.51 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) 97.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.