H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 4-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–0 lead over Aleksandra Wozniak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2013 Tokyo third round 7-6(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2013* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2012* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-7(6) 7-5 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2009* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-6(2) 6-0 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-4 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |