H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 8-0

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 8–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 7–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2016 Cincinnati third round 6-0 6-1.

POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2016* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #5 6-0 6-1 Andrea Petkovic #42 Match data
Apr 22, 2016* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Agnieszka Radwanska #2 1-6 6-1 6-2 Andrea Petkovic #30 Match data
Jan 13, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #8 7-5 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #10 Match data
Oct 9, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 F Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #12 7-5 0-6 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #11 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #12 6-4 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #10 Match data
Aug 6, 2011* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 4-6 6-0 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #11 Match data
Oct 1, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #9 6-3 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #35 Match data
Oct 2, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #12 6-4 3-6 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6
30 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7