H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 2-2

Agnieszka Radwanska and Anna Chakvetadze are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2010 Indian Wells second round 6-2 5-3 RET.

POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #8 6-2 5-3 (ret.) Anna Chakvetadze #70 Match data
Aug 7, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 6-3 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #54 Match data
May 16, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Anna Chakvetadze #8 6-4 1-6 6-1 Agnieszka Radwanska #16 Match data
Feb 28, 2008* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #6 6-2 2-6 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20