H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 1-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2017 Beijing second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2017 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-5 6-3 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Agnieszka Radwanska | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |