H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki holds an 11–6 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 9–6 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2017 Canadian Open third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-3 6-1 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Aug 11, 2017* | R16 | Canadian Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 7-5 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Feb 16, 2017* | R16 | Qatar Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 6-1 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Oct 6, 2016* | R16 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Sep 29, 2016* | R16 | Wuhan Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Sep 24, 2016* | SF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-3 6-2 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | May 7, 2015* | R16 | Madrid Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 7-5 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Oct 20, 2014 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 7-6(5) | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Aug 16, 2014* | QF | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 7-5 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Feb 16, 2013* | QF | Qatar Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 6-3 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Sep 29, 2012* | QF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Jan 14, 2012* | QF | Sydney International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Oct 24, 2011 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 7-5 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Apr 23, 2011* | SF | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 5-0 (ret.) | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Oct 1, 2010* | QF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-2 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Mar 20, 2010* | SF | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 6-1 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Aug 2, 2008* | SF | Stockholm | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 6-1 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data | Aug 4, 2007* | QF | Stockholm | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,103 | 513 | 241 | 68.0% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,154 | 620 | 275 | 69.3% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 30 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #12 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2008 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,105 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,988 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,980 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,906 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,877 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,912 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,961 | 0 | 17 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,004 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #3 | 1,980 | 0 | 20 | 2018 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #3 | 1,947 | 1 | 30 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,823 | 0 | 20 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,845 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2018 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #74 | 1,752 | 0 | 20 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,852 | 1 | 30 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,862 | 1 | 30 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,845 | 1 | 30 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 42 | 13 | 55 | 76.4% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 35 | 18 | 53 | 66.0% | 23 | 6 | 29 | 79.3% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 30 | 14 | 44 | 68.2% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 45 | 9 | 54 | 83.3% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2011 | 40 | 11 | 51 | 78.4% | 20 | 5 | 25 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 42 | 14 | 56 | 75.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 34 | 14 | 48 | 70.8% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 42 | 15 | 57 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 46 | 15 | 61 | 75.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 36 | 16 | 52 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 41 | 14 | 55 | 74.5% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 43 | 13 | 56 | 76.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 370 | 166 | 536 | 69.0% | 75 | 45 | 120 | 62.5% | 66 | 28 | 94 | 70.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | 447 | 188 | 635 | 70.4% | 111 | 59 | 170 | 65.3% | 62 | 28 | 90 | 68.9% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's and 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3/8 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 65.7% | 58.9% | 51.0% | 43.9% | 42.3% | 56.6% | 49.3% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18/27 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 67.3% | 56.6% | 40.0% | 54.4% | 45.4% | 51.4% | 41.8% |
| 17 | 2006 | 10/19 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 65.4% | 59.8% | 46.5% | 60.6% | 47.1% | 55.1% | 46.0% | 2008 | 63/73 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 65.9% | 65.6% | 50.8% | 58.8% | 54.4% | 60.4% | 49.1% |
| 18 | 2007 | 41/46 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 60.6% | 62.9% | 47.7% | 57.5% | 43.5% | 57.3% | 44.3% | 2009 | 86/91 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 68.9% | 64.2% | 50.0% | 52.2% | 49.6% | 59.7% | 48.6% |
| 19 | 2008 | 59/72 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 67.0% | 63.2% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 54.4% | 57.9% | 49.2% | 2010 | 71/80 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 68.9% | 65.3% | 50.2% | 59.5% | 50.1% | 60.6% | 48.1% |
| 20 | 2009 | 64/67 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 66.3% | 62.9% | 48.9% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 58.2% | 48.9% | 2011 | 73/80 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 70.6% | 65.6% | 51.4% | 58.1% | 53.0% | 61.5% | 51.1% |
| 21 | 2010 | 49/50 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 65.6% | 64.1% | 50.5% | 51.5% | 47.9% | 59.2% | 48.8% | 2012 | 60/71 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 66.8% | 63.6% | 51.4% | 59.5% | 52.9% | 59.4% | 47.5% |
| 22 | 2011 | 56/64 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 67.1% | 64.4% | 51.4% | 58.4% | 54.0% | 59.9% | 49.6% | 2013 | 56/63 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 69.1% | 62.5% | 50.3% | 59.3% | 54.1% | 58.9% | 47.5% |
| 23 | 2012 | 68/79 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 67.3% | 66.3% | 46.7% | 56.9% | 56.1% | 59.9% | 49.0% | 2014 | 61/68 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 69.6% | 66.0% | 48.0% | 58.7% | 53.3% | 60.4% | 48.1% |
| 24 | 2013 | 69/76 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 64.9% | 65.6% | 50.7% | 55.0% | 53.1% | 60.4% | 48.1% | 2015 | 51/62 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 69.9% | 65.3% | 52.6% | 50.4% | 51.3% | 61.5% | 46.7% |
| 25 | 2014 | 60/65 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 65.5% | 63.3% | 48.2% | 56.8% | 52.0% | 58.2% | 49.8% | 2016 | 44/52 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 67.7% | 66.5% | 46.3% | 57.0% | 56.3% | 59.9% | 47.8% |
| 26 | 2015 | 49/72 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 66.7% | 68.4% | 51.3% | 56.8% | 54.6% | 62.7% | 46.7% | 2017 | 76/82 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 67.6% | 65.7% | 49.4% | 56.8% | 51.6% | 60.2% | 47.8% |
| 27 | 2016 | 60/73 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 62.4% | 67.3% | 47.7% | 60.1% | 57.3% | 60.0% | 49.8% | 2018 | 50/58 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 64.9% | 68.0% | 48.4% | 52.5% | 54.9% | 61.2% | 48.3% |
| 28 | 2017 | 42/43 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 61.8% | 64.9% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 46.7% | 57.5% | 46.3% | 2019 | 35/35 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 65.3% | 63.2% | 50.1% | 51.6% | 50.7% | 58.5% | 44.4% |
| 29 | 2018 | 24/29 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 59.8% | 44.2% | 45.6% | 42.6% | 53.4% | 43.2% | 2020 | 7/7 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 70.4% | 68.7% | 54.5% | 63.1% | 43.8% | 64.8% | 49.2% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7/7 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 61.5% | 67.5% | 47.4% | 57.7% | 36.6% | 59.6% | 44.8% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27/29 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 64.3% | 65.3% | 47.6% | 55.5% | 55.0% | 59.1% | 46.8% |
| Career | — | 651/755 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 65.1% | 64.6% | 48.5% | 55.1% | 52.4% | 59.0% | 48.2% | — | 788/895 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 67.9% | 65.0% | 49.7% | 56.4% | 52.2% | 60.0% | 47.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1482 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1527 | 119.1 | +0.53 | +0.91 | 1.137 | 52.5% | +17 | — | — | 47.1% | -0.12 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.46 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1556 | 117.2 | -2.81 | -1.82 | 0.860 | 46.7% | +15 | -35 | — | 46.0% | -0.59 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–1 (88%) | — | +0.40 |
| 17 | 2006 | 1673 | 141.6 | +0.60 | +1.54 | 1.026 | 50.8% | -31 | -111 | +25 | 58.1% | +0.40 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.39 | 2008 | 1914 | 154.8 | +4.79 | +4.70 | 1.241 | 54.7% | -5 | -303 | -228 | 69.9% | +1.69 | 9–5 (64%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -0.96 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1810 | 145.1 | +1.25 | +1.05 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -9 | -215 | -55 | 57.7% | +0.58 | 8–8 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.85 | 2009 | 1899 | 153.9 | +3.97 | +4.82 | 1.208 | 54.1% | -27 | -24 | -64 | 69.4% | +1.47 | 15–8 (65%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | -0.77 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1914 | 152.0 | +2.51 | +4.81 | 1.167 | 53.4% | -49 | -105 | +11 | 66.0% | +1.18 | 14–7 (67%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +0.97 | 2010 | 2105 | 166.0 | +4.94 | +4.76 | 1.219 | 54.3% | +27 | -204 | -284 | 72.4% | +1.70 | 18–4 (82%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +1.46 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1913 | 151.3 | +2.63 | +4.78 | 1.172 | 53.5% | -27 | -59 | +42 | 62.8% | +0.99 | 11–9 (55%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | +1.49 | 2011 | 1988 | 162.1 | +5.76 | +7.01 | 1.328 | 56.0% | +52 | -9 | -153 | 74.7% | +1.90 | 11–7 (61%) | 10–5 (67%) | — | +1.97 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1862 | 156.5 | +3.54 | +5.02 | 1.197 | 53.9% | +37 | -47 | +77 | 66.0% | +1.38 | 2–8 (20%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +2.07 | 2012 | 1976 | 156.2 | +3.80 | +4.12 | 1.171 | 53.6% | +42 | -42 | -144 | 66.9% | +1.29 | 15–9 (63%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | +0.75 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1980 | 161.2 | +4.42 | +6.19 | 1.237 | 54.8% | +22 | -148 | -85 | 67.3% | +1.27 | 12–11 (52%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | +2.26 | 2013 | 1906 | 152.3 | +3.39 | +3.53 | 1.156 | 53.3% | +82 | -137 | -61 | 61.0% | +1.06 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | +3.21 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1989 | 163.4 | +4.85 | +5.61 | 1.223 | 54.4% | +44 | -42 | -81 | 72.4% | +1.53 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.14 | 2014 | 2014 | 163.0 | +4.24 | +5.25 | 1.216 | 54.2% | +24 | -280 | -133 | 64.9% | +1.45 | 16–6 (73%) | 5–10 (33%) | — | -0.30 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1966 | 161.1 | +5.04 | +4.68 | 1.217 | 54.2% | +44 | -43 | -7 | 70.9% | +1.54 | 10–5 (67%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +1.71 | 2015 | 1818 | 153.2 | +3.21 | +4.72 | 1.211 | 54.0% | +6 | -9 | +74 | 62.6% | +1.23 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | -0.90 |
| 25 | 2014 | 1877 | 160.3 | +2.22 | +5.84 | 1.190 | 53.9% | +20 | +68 | +42 | 63.6% | +1.24 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +1.73 | 2016 | 1912 | 146.8 | +3.41 | +3.91 | 1.191 | 53.8% | +27 | — | -117 | 65.2% | +1.25 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.32 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1962 | 156.6 | +4.09 | +5.26 | 1.249 | 54.7% | +2 | -94 | -3 | 67.3% | +1.52 | 9–13 (41%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.24 | 2017 | 2004 | 161.0 | +3.93 | +4.95 | 1.202 | 54.0% | +52 | -146 | -103 | 68.5% | +1.56 | 17–8 (68%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +0.13 |
| 27 | 2016 | 1980 | 161.7 | +4.05 | +6.47 | 1.245 | 54.9% | +48 | -113 | -53 | 72.2% | +1.73 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | +0.07 | 2018 | 1947 | 156.8 | +4.39 | +5.24 | 1.245 | 54.7% | +6 | -64 | +24 | 67.7% | +1.47 | 12–6 (67%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.11 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1823 | 139.7 | +1.36 | +2.93 | 1.090 | 51.9% | +30 | +27 | +110 | 57.7% | +0.56 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +1.52 | 2019 | 1845 | 144.8 | +1.89 | +0.99 | 1.069 | 51.3% | +47 | -6 | +118 | 60.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.87 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1752 | 134.0 | -1.95 | +0.83 | 0.927 | 48.2% | +14 | — | +160 | 47.6% | -0.17 | 7–2 (78%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.80 | 2020 | 1853 | 131.5 | +2.36 | +2.51 | 1.397 | 56.9% | +35 | — | — | 70.6% | +1.71 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.18 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1863 | 134.9 | +2.02 | +2.05 | 1.110 | 51.8% | +58 | — | — | 56.3% | +0.56 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1845 | 140.8 | +1.93 | +2.73 | 1.145 | 53.0% | +44 | -42 | +224 | 58.1% | +0.77 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.15 |
| Career | — | 2104 | 161.3 | +3.16 | +4.74 | 1.175 | 53.6% | +16 | -74 | +8 | 65.6% | +1.20 | 107–96 (53%) | 70–61 (53%) | 95.2 | +1.29 | — | 2154 | 160.9 | +3.84 | +4.42 | 1.199 | 53.9% | +28 | -90 | -57 | 66.3% | +1.33 | 153–96 (61%) | 94–79 (54%) | 104.3 | +0.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 13 | 18 | Mar 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6 | 11 | 17 | Aug 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 13 | 17 | Jul 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 6 | 8 | 14 | Aug 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 2 | 12 | 14 | Oct 25, 2015 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 11 | 6 | 17 | Aug 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 8 | 8 | 16 | Mar 13, 2024 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 7 | 8 | 15 | Aug 31, 2023 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 10 | 4 | 14 | Sep 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 8 | 6 | 14 | Jun 6, 2017 | H2H |