H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Dinara Safina H2H: 1-2
Dinara Safina holds a 2–1 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2010 San Diego fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2010* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-3 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2010* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 7-5 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| May 2, 2009* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Dinara Safina | 6-4 6-2 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Dinara Safina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |