H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska and Dominika Cibulkova are tied 6–6 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 6–3 on hard courts, while Dominika Cibulkova leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2016 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 5-7 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominika Cibulkova | 6-3 5-7 9-7 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Jul 5, 2016* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Jun 25, 2016* | QF | Eastbourne Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | May 2, 2016 | R64 | Madrid Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Mar 12, 2016* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 6-1 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Sep 26, 2015* | SF | Pan Pacific Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Mar 22, 2014* | QF | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 6-1 6-2 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Jan 26, 2014* | SF | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 6-4 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Sep 27, 2013* | R16 | Pan Pacific Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Jul 28, 2013* | F | Stanford | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-0 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Jan 13, 2013* | F | Sydney International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-3 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Aug 31, 2008* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 6-7(1) 6-4 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data | Feb 23, 2008* | QF | Qatar Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,103 | 513 | 241 | 68.0% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,964 | 368 | 265 | 58.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,843 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,980 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,894 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,877 | 0 | 14 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,719 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,961 | 0 | 17 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2016 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #3 | 1,980 | 0 | 20 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,823 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2018 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #74 | 1,752 | 0 | 20 | 2018 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #315 | 1,755 | 0 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2006 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 30 | 14 | 44 | 68.2% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2009 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2009 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 29 | 15 | 44 | 65.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2012 | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 46 | 15 | 61 | 75.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2014 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29 | 17 | 46 | 63.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 36 | 16 | 52 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 43 | 13 | 56 | 76.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 37 | 17 | 54 | 68.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22 | 15 | 37 | 59.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 370 | 166 | 536 | 69.0% | 75 | 45 | 120 | 62.5% | 66 | 28 | 94 | 70.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | 254 | 185 | 439 | 57.9% | 72 | 53 | 125 | 57.6% | 39 | 24 | 63 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's and 560/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10/19 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 65.4% | 59.8% | 46.5% | 60.6% | 47.1% | 55.1% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 41/46 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 60.6% | 62.9% | 47.7% | 57.5% | 43.5% | 57.3% | 44.3% | 2007 | 23/34 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 62.2% | 56.6% | 46.2% | 51.0% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 45.7% |
| 19 | 2008 | 59/72 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 67.0% | 63.2% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 54.4% | 57.9% | 49.2% | 2008 | 56/62 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 68.4% | 60.8% | 48.3% | 54.4% | 46.5% | 56.7% | 46.6% |
| 20 | 2009 | 64/67 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 66.3% | 62.9% | 48.9% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 58.2% | 48.9% | 2009 | 36/37 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 67.4% | 60.0% | 49.3% | 52.6% | 53.6% | 56.4% | 46.9% |
| 21 | 2010 | 49/50 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 65.6% | 64.1% | 50.5% | 51.5% | 47.9% | 59.2% | 48.8% | 2010 | 50/54 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 63.2% | 60.8% | 46.2% | 53.9% | 50.9% | 55.6% | 43.9% |
| 22 | 2011 | 56/64 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 67.1% | 64.4% | 51.4% | 58.4% | 54.0% | 59.9% | 49.6% | 2011 | 53/62 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 56.1% | 64.9% | 46.5% | 54.6% | 53.9% | 56.8% | 48.0% |
| 23 | 2012 | 68/79 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 67.3% | 66.3% | 46.7% | 56.9% | 56.1% | 59.9% | 49.0% | 2012 | 52/60 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 54.2% | 66.3% | 45.8% | 50.4% | 53.3% | 56.4% | 48.0% |
| 24 | 2013 | 69/76 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 64.9% | 65.6% | 50.7% | 55.0% | 53.1% | 60.4% | 48.1% | 2013 | 45/50 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 60.8% | 61.9% | 44.4% | 53.5% | 44.6% | 55.1% | 45.9% |
| 25 | 2014 | 60/65 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 65.5% | 63.3% | 48.2% | 56.8% | 52.0% | 58.2% | 49.8% | 2014 | 51/55 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 66.5% | 62.6% | 45.5% | 57.1% | 50.5% | 57.0% | 47.7% |
| 26 | 2015 | 49/72 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 66.7% | 68.4% | 51.3% | 56.8% | 54.6% | 62.7% | 46.7% | 2015 | 24/35 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 67.0% | 61.0% | 48.2% | 53.0% | 43.9% | 56.6% | 43.0% |
| 27 | 2016 | 60/73 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 62.4% | 67.3% | 47.7% | 60.1% | 57.3% | 60.0% | 49.8% | 2016 | 67/74 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 66.4% | 62.7% | 47.5% | 54.7% | 50.3% | 57.8% | 48.0% |
| 28 | 2017 | 42/43 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 61.8% | 64.9% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 46.7% | 57.5% | 46.3% | 2017 | 48/48 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 66.1% | 61.9% | 48.2% | 55.0% | 49.4% | 57.2% | 45.4% |
| 29 | 2018 | 24/29 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 59.8% | 44.2% | 45.6% | 42.6% | 53.4% | 43.2% | 2018 | 45/48 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 65.2% | 63.3% | 48.4% | 55.6% | 48.6% | 58.1% | 44.3% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10/11 | 0.9 | 4.5 | 66.1% | 58.8% | 45.1% | 54.3% | 40.4% | 54.2% | 38.4% |
| Career | — | 651/755 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 65.1% | 64.6% | 48.5% | 55.1% | 52.4% | 59.0% | 48.2% | — | 560/634 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 63.5% | 62.2% | 47.0% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 56.5% | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1673 | 141.6 | +0.60 | +1.54 | 1.026 | 50.8% | -31 | -111 | +25 | 58.1% | +0.40 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.39 | 2006 | 1506 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.22 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1810 | 145.1 | +1.25 | +1.05 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -9 | -215 | -55 | 57.7% | +0.58 | 8–8 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.85 | 2007 | 1606 | 123.4 | -2.75 | +1.36 | 0.957 | 49.0% | -43 | +45 | — | 48.7% | +0.04 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.03 |
| 19 | 2008 | 1914 | 152.0 | +2.51 | +4.81 | 1.167 | 53.4% | -49 | -105 | +11 | 66.0% | +1.18 | 14–7 (67%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | +0.97 | 2008 | 1844 | 155.6 | +2.09 | +2.87 | 1.075 | 51.6% | -8 | -147 | — | 59.4% | +0.56 | 10–9 (53%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | -3.69 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1913 | 151.3 | +2.63 | +4.78 | 1.172 | 53.5% | -27 | -59 | +42 | 62.8% | +0.99 | 11–9 (55%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | +1.49 | 2009 | 1735 | 137.2 | +0.81 | +1.93 | 1.075 | 51.5% | -29 | +84 | -128 | 59.0% | +0.64 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.20 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1862 | 156.5 | +3.54 | +5.02 | 1.197 | 53.9% | +37 | -47 | +77 | 66.0% | +1.38 | 2–8 (20%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +2.07 | 2010 | 1754 | 142.7 | +0.27 | +0.68 | 0.989 | 49.8% | -26 | +62 | -79 | 54.4% | +0.28 | 9–8 (53%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +0.39 |
| 22 | 2011 | 1980 | 161.2 | +4.42 | +6.19 | 1.237 | 54.8% | +22 | -148 | -85 | 67.3% | +1.27 | 12–11 (52%) | 6–9 (40%) | — | +2.26 | 2011 | 1894 | 146.9 | +1.53 | +4.23 | 1.113 | 52.5% | -32 | -107 | -88 | 61.0% | +0.76 | 15–7 (68%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -1.26 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1989 | 163.4 | +4.85 | +5.61 | 1.223 | 54.4% | +44 | -42 | -81 | 72.4% | +1.53 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.14 | 2012 | 1791 | 146.5 | +0.57 | +4.09 | 1.101 | 52.3% | -2 | +69 | -30 | 59.1% | +0.78 | 6–11 (35%) | 10–4 (71%) | — | +0.95 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1966 | 161.1 | +5.04 | +4.68 | 1.217 | 54.2% | +44 | -43 | -7 | 70.9% | +1.54 | 10–5 (67%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +1.71 | 2013 | 1735 | 139.1 | +0.40 | +2.51 | 1.022 | 50.5% | +15 | +39 | +28 | 51.7% | +0.30 | 11–7 (61%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.89 |
| 25 | 2014 | 1877 | 160.3 | +2.22 | +5.84 | 1.190 | 53.9% | +20 | +68 | +42 | 63.6% | +1.24 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +1.73 | 2014 | 1719 | 152.6 | +1.29 | +4.23 | 1.109 | 52.3% | +50 | +17 | +28 | 59.8% | +0.75 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.25 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1962 | 156.6 | +4.09 | +5.26 | 1.249 | 54.7% | +2 | -94 | -3 | 67.3% | +1.52 | 9–13 (41%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.24 | 2015 | 1757 | 143.5 | -0.51 | +1.77 | 0.989 | 49.9% | +26 | — | -24 | 50.6% | +0.07 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | -0.11 |
| 27 | 2016 | 1980 | 161.7 | +4.05 | +6.47 | 1.245 | 54.9% | +48 | -113 | -53 | 72.2% | +1.73 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | +0.07 | 2016 | 1952 | 148.1 | +2.12 | +4.65 | 1.136 | 52.9% | -29 | -154 | -64 | 65.1% | +0.91 | 19–10 (66%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -1.07 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1823 | 139.7 | +1.36 | +2.93 | 1.090 | 51.9% | +30 | +27 | +110 | 57.7% | +0.56 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +1.52 | 2017 | 1778 | 142.2 | +0.88 | +1.87 | 1.062 | 51.4% | +59 | -13 | +40 | 55.3% | +0.37 | 9–11 (45%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +2.63 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1752 | 134.0 | -1.95 | +0.83 | 0.927 | 48.2% | +14 | — | +160 | 47.6% | -0.17 | 7–2 (78%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.80 | 2018 | 1872 | 145.7 | +1.54 | +1.61 | 1.058 | 51.3% | +3 | -108 | -24 | 58.3% | +0.53 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -0.82 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1755 | 115.9 | -0.72 | -0.79 | 0.839 | 46.7% | +34 | -72 | — | 29.6% | -1.19 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | -0.69 |
| Career | — | 2104 | 161.3 | +3.16 | +4.74 | 1.175 | 53.6% | +16 | -74 | +8 | 65.6% | +1.20 | 107–96 (53%) | 70–61 (53%) | 95.2 | +1.29 | — | 1964 | 150.3 | +0.94 | +2.80 | 1.063 | 51.4% | 0 | -11 | -38 | 57.0% | +0.50 | 116–98 (54%) | 83–60 (58%) | 107.2 | -0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 13 | 18 | Mar 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6 | 11 | 17 | Aug 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 13 | 17 | Jul 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 6 | 8 | 14 | Aug 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 2 | 12 | 14 | Oct 25, 2015 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 4 | 10 | 14 | Sep 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 8 | 13 | Mar 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 6 | 6 | 12 | Sep 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6 | 6 | 12 | Jul 5, 2016 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 7 | 3 | 10 | Jul 4, 2018 | H2H |