H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 3-1

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–1 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2016 Qatar Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-4 6-4 Kateryna Volodko #75 Match data Feb 24, 2016* R32 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Agnieszka Radwanska #13 7-5 6-3 Kateryna Volodko #64 Match data Aug 21, 2009* R16 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Agnieszka Radwanska #12 6-2 6-4 Kateryna Volodko #60 Match data May 30, 2009* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Kateryna Volodko #59 7-6(7) 4-6 6-1 Agnieszka Radwanska #10 Match data Jan 21, 2009* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,103 513 241 68.0% 0 5 1 7 7 20
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,672 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,809 0 1 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0
19 2008 52–20 72.2% #10 1,914 0 4 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,912 0 4 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,862 0 4 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,980 0 7 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1
23 2012 59–20 74.7% #4 1,988 0 10 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,966 0 13 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,877 0 14 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,961 0 17 — — — — — — —
27 2016 53–19 73.6% #3 1,980 0 20 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,823 0 20 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1
29 2018 15–14 51.7% #74 1,752 0 20 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Kateryna Volodko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2007 18 10 28 64.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2008 30 14 44 68.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2009 28 16 44 63.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2010 25 12 37 67.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2011 36 12 48 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 41 13 54 75.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2013 46 15 61 75.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2014 31 16 47 66.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2015 36 16 52 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 43 13 56 76.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 370 166 536 69.0% 75 45 120 62.5% 66 28 94 70.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's and 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Kateryna Volodko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 10/19 1.8 1.6 65.4% 59.8% 46.5% 60.6% 47.1% 55.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 41/46 2.0 1.8 60.6% 62.9% 47.7% 57.5% 43.5% 57.3% 44.3% 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6%
19 2008 59/72 1.4 1.4 67.0% 63.2% 46.8% 50.4% 54.4% 57.9% 49.2% 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2%
20 2009 64/67 1.5 1.5 66.3% 62.9% 48.9% 52.1% 56.0% 58.2% 48.9% 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3%
21 2010 49/50 1.6 1.2 65.6% 64.1% 50.5% 51.5% 47.9% 59.2% 48.8% 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0%
22 2011 56/64 2.3 1.2 67.1% 64.4% 51.4% 58.4% 54.0% 59.9% 49.6% 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8%
23 2012 68/79 2.4 1.2 67.3% 66.3% 46.7% 56.9% 56.1% 59.9% 49.0% 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1%
24 2013 69/76 2.4 1.6 64.9% 65.6% 50.7% 55.0% 53.1% 60.4% 48.1% 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7%
25 2014 60/65 2.4 1.3 65.5% 63.3% 48.2% 56.8% 52.0% 58.2% 49.8% 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7%
26 2015 49/72 2.5 1.3 66.7% 68.4% 51.3% 56.8% 54.6% 62.7% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 60/73 2.8 1.8 62.4% 67.3% 47.7% 60.1% 57.3% 60.0% 49.8% 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4%
28 2017 42/43 2.0 1.6 61.8% 64.9% 45.8% 53.6% 46.7% 57.5% 46.3% 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7%
29 2018 24/29 1.4 1.9 60.8% 59.8% 44.2% 45.6% 42.6% 53.4% 43.2% 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8%
Career — 651/755 2.1 1.5 65.1% 64.6% 48.5% 55.1% 52.4% 59.0% 48.2% — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Kateryna Volodko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13
17 2006 1673 141.6 +0.60 +1.54 1.026 50.8% -31 -111 +25 58.1% +0.40 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.3 -0.39 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
18 2007 1810 145.1 +1.25 +1.05 1.037 50.9% -9 -215 -55 57.7% +0.58 8–8 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -0.85 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22
19 2008 1914 152.0 +2.51 +4.81 1.167 53.4% -49 -105 +11 66.0% +1.18 14–7 (67%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.97 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 2009 1913 151.3 +2.63 +4.78 1.172 53.5% -27 -59 +42 62.8% +0.99 11–9 (55%) 4–10 (29%) 92.8 +1.49 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23
21 2010 1862 156.5 +3.54 +5.02 1.197 53.9% +37 -47 +77 66.0% +1.38 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 91.3 +2.07 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94
22 2011 1980 161.2 +4.42 +6.19 1.237 54.8% +22 -148 -85 67.3% +1.27 12–11 (52%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 +2.26 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90
23 2012 1989 163.4 +4.85 +5.61 1.223 54.4% +44 -42 -81 72.4% +1.53 11–7 (61%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.14 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17
24 2013 1966 161.1 +5.04 +4.68 1.217 54.2% +44 -43 -7 70.9% +1.54 10–5 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 103.6 +1.71 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37
25 2014 1877 160.3 +2.22 +5.84 1.190 53.9% +20 +68 +42 63.6% +1.24 8–7 (53%) 7–5 (58%) 99.1 +1.73 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12
26 2015 1962 156.6 +4.09 +5.26 1.249 54.7% +2 -94 -3 67.3% +1.52 9–13 (41%) 3–6 (33%) 90.4 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 1980 161.7 +4.05 +6.47 1.245 54.9% +48 -113 -53 72.2% +1.73 8–10 (44%) 8–6 (57%) 94.0 +0.07 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07
28 2017 1823 139.7 +1.38 +2.93 1.090 51.9% +30 +27 +110 57.7% +0.56 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 +1.52 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36
29 2018 1752 134.0 -1.95 +0.83 0.927 48.2% +14 — +160 47.6% -0.17 7–2 (78%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 -0.80 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29
Career — 2104 161.3 +3.16 +4.74 1.175 53.6% +16 -74 +8 65.6% +1.20 107–96 (53%) 70–61 (53%) 95.2 +1.29 — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.