H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-0

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2012 China Open round of 16 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Agnieszka Radwanska #3 2-6 6-1 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #64 Match data Oct 5, 2012* R16 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,103 513 241 68.0% 0 5 1 7 7 20
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,809 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2008 52–20 72.2% #10 1,914 0 4 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,912 0 4 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,862 0 4 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,980 0 7 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2012 59–20 74.7% #4 1,988 0 10 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,966 0 13 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,877 0 14 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,961 0 17 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2016 53–19 73.6% #3 1,980 0 20 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,823 0 20 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2018 15–14 51.7% #74 1,752 0 20 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 18 10 28 64.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 30 14 44 68.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2009 28 16 44 63.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 25 12 37 67.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 36 12 48 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 41 13 54 75.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2013 46 15 61 75.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2014 31 16 47 66.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2015 36 16 52 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2016 43 13 56 76.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 370 166 536 69.0% 75 45 120 62.5% 66 28 94 70.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1673 141.6 +0.60 +1.54 1.026 50.8% -31 -111 +25 58.1% +0.40 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.3 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1810 145.1 +1.25 +1.05 1.037 50.9% -9 -215 -55 57.7% +0.58 8–8 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1914 152.0 +2.51 +4.81 1.167 53.4% -49 -105 +11 66.0% +1.18 14–7 (67%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.97 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2009 1913 151.3 +2.63 +4.78 1.172 53.5% -27 -59 +42 62.8% +0.99 11–9 (55%) 4–10 (29%) 92.8 +1.49 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2010 1862 156.5 +3.54 +5.02 1.197 53.9% +37 -47 +77 66.0% +1.38 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 91.3 +2.07 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2011 1980 161.2 +4.42 +6.19 1.237 54.8% +22 -148 -85 67.3% +1.27 12–11 (52%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 +2.26 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2012 1989 163.4 +4.85 +5.61 1.223 54.4% +44 -42 -81 72.4% +1.53 11–7 (61%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.14 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2013 1966 161.1 +5.04 +4.68 1.217 54.2% +44 -43 -7 70.9% +1.54 10–5 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 103.6 +1.71 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2014 1877 160.3 +2.22 +5.84 1.190 53.9% +20 +68 +42 63.6% +1.24 8–7 (53%) 7–5 (58%) 99.1 +1.73 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2015 1962 156.6 +4.09 +5.26 1.249 54.7% +2 -94 -3 67.3% +1.52 9–13 (41%) 3–6 (33%) 90.4 -0.24 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2016 1980 161.7 +4.05 +6.47 1.245 54.9% +48 -113 -53 72.2% +1.73 8–10 (44%) 8–6 (57%) 94.0 +0.07 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2017 1823 139.7 +1.38 +2.93 1.090 51.9% +30 +27 +110 57.7% +0.56 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 +1.52 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2018 1752 134.0 -1.95 +0.83 0.927 48.2% +14 — +160 47.6% -0.17 7–2 (78%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 -0.80 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 2104 161.3 +3.16 +4.74 1.175 53.6% +16 -74 +8 65.6% +1.20 107–96 (53%) 70–61 (53%) 95.2 +1.29 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.