H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 1-5

Lucie Safarova holds a 5–1 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2018 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-4.

POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 5, 2018* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Lucie Safarova #66 7-5 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #30 Match data
Oct 21, 2011* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #27 6-4 4-6 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #8 Match data
Feb 24, 2011* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #35 7-6(3) 6-3 Agnieszka Radwanska #10 Match data
May 7, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Lucie Safarova #35 1-6 6-3 7-6(1) Agnieszka Radwanska #9 Match data
Oct 17, 2009* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #10 6-3 7-6(9) Lucie Safarova #41 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #26 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(4) Agnieszka Radwanska #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7