H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Hingis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2007 Miami third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |