H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 0-3
Petra Cetkovska holds a 3–0 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2012 Rome third round 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2011* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Petra Cetkovska | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Petra Cetkovska | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |