H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 5-8
Petra Kvitova holds a 8–5 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 7–5 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2018 New Haven third round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5
–
8
13 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Agnieszka Radwanska | Petra Kvitova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 |
| 25 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 |
| 26 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 |
| 27 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 |