H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Agnieszka Radwanska vs Shahar Peer H2H: 4-3

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–3 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Shahar Peer leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-1.

POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-1 6-1 Shahar Peer #140 Match data
Feb 24, 2012* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #6 7-5 6-4 Shahar Peer #40 Match data
Aug 7, 2010* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #10 6-2 6-0 Shahar Peer #17 Match data
Apr 30, 2010* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Shahar Peer #20 6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 Agnieszka Radwanska #8 Match data
Oct 18, 2007* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #31 6-4 6-3 Shahar Peer #16 Match data
Sep 4, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Shahar Peer #19 6-4 6-1 Agnieszka Radwanska #32 Match data
May 16, 2007* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Shahar Peer #15 6-0 2-0 (ret.) Agnieszka Radwanska #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agnieszka Radwanska Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20