H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-0
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 6-1 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 7-6(6) | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,103 | 507 | 240 | 67.9% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,636 | 49 | 84 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Agnieszka Radwanska | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,980 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,961 | 0 | 17 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #3 | 1,961 | 0 | 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,732 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |