H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ajla Tomljanovic vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands H2H: 1-0

Ajla Tomljanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ajla Tomljanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2013 Quebec City round of 16 7-5 3-6 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ajla Tomljanovic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #385 6-4 3-6 7-6(7) Ajla Tomljanovic #57 Match data Feb 15, 2020 Q1 Q Dubai Tennis Championships Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Ajla Tomljanovic #101 7-5 3-6 4-1 (ret.) Bethanie Mattek-Sands #46 Match data Sep 13, 2013* R16 Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ajla Tomljanovic #103 #32 1,490 1,919 192 227 45.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Bethanie Mattek-Sands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 0–1 0.0% #301 1,484 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 2010 1–3 25.0% #164 1,465 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
18 2011 1–5 16.7% #149 1,435 0 0 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0
19 2012 0–1 0.0% #493 1,420 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0
20 2013 7–7 50.0% #73 1,523 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0
21 2014 17–20 45.9% #63 1,587 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0
22 2015 18–21 46.2% #65 1,604 0 0 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0
23 2016 0–2 0.0% #929 1,581 0 0 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0
24 2017 5–10 33.3% #136 1,571 0 0 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0
25 2018 22–19 53.7% #46 1,713 0 0 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0
26 2019 25–29 46.3% #51 1,653 0 0 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0
27 2020 5–11 31.2% #68 1,615 0 0 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0
28 2021 24–22 52.2% #45 1,778 0 0 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0
29 2022 28–24 53.8% #33 1,867 0 0 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0
30 2023 1–2 33.3% #290 1,847 0 0 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0
31 2024 9–15 37.5% #109 1,791 0 0 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0
32 2025 17–22 43.6% #80 1,768 0 0 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 2026 12–13 48.0% #103 1,715 0 0 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
24 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2022 14 15 29 48.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2024 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2025 11 14 25 44.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2026 8 5 13 61.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 118 142 260 45.4% 45 57 102 44.1% 29 28 57 50.9% — — — — — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 388/420 of Ajla Tomljanovic's and 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 1/1 1.0 7.0 58.7% 61.4% 35.5% 50.0% 66.7% 50.7% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 4/4 2.5 4.3 56.4% 63.8% 45.0% 54.7% 49.3% 55.4% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6/6 3.0 4.7 56.9% 62.3% 39.8% 53.5% 54.9% 52.7% 48.2% 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4%
19 2012 1/1 0.0 8.0 54.2% 53.8% 27.3% 25.0% 44.4% 41.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 11/14 4.5 4.5 56.5% 64.4% 45.5% 54.6% 49.4% 56.3% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 32/37 4.2 4.3 56.7% 68.6% 43.3% 54.3% 46.9% 57.7% 41.4% 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2%
22 2015 33/39 4.1 4.3 62.9% 64.1% 48.0% 47.9% 47.0% 58.1% 39.9% 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2%
23 2016 2/2 2.0 5.0 54.1% 51.0% 30.3% 57.2% 70.8% 41.5% 43.0% 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5%
24 2017 15/15 2.1 5.7 58.1% 61.2% 36.9% 45.7% 39.5% 50.7% 41.8% 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6%
25 2018 41/41 3.4 4.9 58.4% 64.1% 43.8% 46.4% 51.9% 55.6% 44.1% 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0%
26 2019 53/54 3.5 4.3 57.9% 66.8% 41.5% 49.1% 46.9% 56.3% 44.0% 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5%
27 2020 16/16 3.3 4.3 55.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.0% 40.7% 56.3% 40.8% 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9%
28 2021 44/46 2.5 4.0 61.8% 64.4% 45.8% 55.9% 46.4% 57.2% 43.6% 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9%
29 2022 52/52 2.6 4.2 62.5% 64.6% 43.8% 48.1% 52.0% 56.8% 44.1% 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9%
30 2023 2/3 3.0 5.0 65.3% 62.9% 47.1% 43.8% 48.0% 57.5% 43.1% 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4%
31 2024 22/24 2.9 7.5 64.1% 62.8% 38.0% 50.7% 40.5% 53.9% 42.4% 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5%
32 2025 28/39 2.2 5.6 65.8% 61.9% 42.1% 49.1% 51.2% 55.2% 43.4% 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2%
33 2026 25/26 1.9 5.7 67.2% 63.3% 44.0% 54.1% 53.1% 56.9% 45.4% 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3%
Career — 388/420 3.0 4.8 60.7% 64.4% 43.3% 50.2% 48.3% 56.1% 43.1% — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2009 1484 97.7 -3.11 -1.39 0.579 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24
17 2010 1465 98.9 -2.42 -2.23 0.863 47.3% +22 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24
18 2011 1436 104.6 -1.59 +0.58 1.019 50.4% +18 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.07 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11
19 2012 1421 96.4 -2.81 -3.22 0.731 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26
20 2013 1524 117.9 -0.54 -0.01 1.015 50.1% +16 — +14 50.0% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 3–0 (100%) — 0.00 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17
21 2014 1588 121.5 +0.93 -1.84 0.978 49.5% -16 +10 — 48.2% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 102.5 +0.94 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91
22 2015 1605 119.3 -0.59 -1.44 0.953 49.0% -12 +8 -87 45.1% -0.46 8–5 (62%) 12–3 (80%) 109.7 +0.57 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75
23 2016 1581 102.8 -1.21 +0.88 0.734 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78
24 2017 1571 112.5 -3.75 +0.50 0.848 46.2% +16 -10 — 42.4% -0.94 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.62 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14
25 2018 1714 128.3 -0.28 +0.61 0.992 49.8% -20 -131 -150 51.0% +0.03 12–8 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 103.1 -0.62 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05
26 2019 1654 138.3 -0.07 +1.07 1.005 50.1% +8 -20 -47 50.0% +0.06 6–12 (33%) 6–11 (35%) 94.0 -0.88 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55
27 2020 1615 130.7 +0.18 -1.12 0.935 48.5% +33 -43 — 36.8% -0.79 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.6 -0.53 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24
28 2021 1779 141.3 +0.91 +0.76 1.019 50.3% -67 -93 -32 52.0% +0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 103.3 -0.37 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57
29 2022 1867 144.0 +0.10 +1.33 1.021 50.4% -31 -149 -23 53.0% +0.16 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 101.7 -1.02 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42
30 2023 1848 99.8 -0.66 +1.44 1.016 50.2% -57 — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.22 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68
31 2024 1792 122.8 -1.50 -0.80 0.920 48.1% -16 -35 +106 41.1% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.2 -0.89 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05
32 2025 1769 134.0 -0.96 +0.30 0.968 49.2% -15 -12 +78 46.2% -0.34 8–9 (47%) 9–1 (90%) 104.4 -0.95 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16
33 2026 1715 134.5 -0.15 +1.20 1.055 51.2% +101 -102 +130 50.0% +0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +0.08 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 136.5 -0.29 +0.21 0.982 49.6% -8 -55 -5 47.6% -0.20 75–88 (46%) 63–57 (53%) 103.1 -0.82 — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.