H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Irina-Camelia Begu H2H: 1-3
Irina-Camelia Begu holds a 3–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Irina-Camelia Begu leads 3–0 on clay, while Ajla Tomljanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina-Camelia Begu won the 2022 Charleston third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2022* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-2 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2018* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Irina-Camelia Begu | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2013* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Jul 8, 2011* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-4 6-4 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | #204 | #22 | 1,925 | 1,886 | 249 | 234 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Irina-Camelia Begu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #41 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #29 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #34 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #75 | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #144 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,726 | 0 | 6 |