H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ajla Tomljanovic vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-2

Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Qatar Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ajla Tomljanovic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #16 6-2 6-2 Ajla Tomljanovic #41 Match data Feb 13, 2019* R32 Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julia Goerges #50 7-5 6-2 Ajla Tomljanovic #664 Match data Mar 10, 2017* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Ajla Tomljanovic #242 7-6(4) 6-2 Julia Goerges #26 Match data Mar 20, 2013* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ajla Tomljanovic #103 #32 1,490 1,919 192 227 45.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 0–1 0.0% #301 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 1–3 25.0% #164 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–5 16.7% #149 1,435 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
19 2012 0–1 0.0% #493 1,420 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
20 2013 7–7 50.0% #73 1,523 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0
21 2014 17–20 45.9% #63 1,587 0 0 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
22 2015 18–21 46.2% #65 1,604 0 0 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2
23 2016 0–2 0.0% #929 1,581 0 0 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2
24 2017 5–10 33.3% #136 1,571 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2
25 2018 22–19 53.7% #46 1,713 0 0 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2
26 2019 25–29 46.3% #51 1,653 0 0 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2
27 2020 5–11 31.2% #68 1,615 0 0 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2
28 2021 24–22 52.2% #45 1,778 0 0 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4
29 2022 28–24 53.8% #33 1,867 0 0 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6
30 2023 1–2 33.3% #290 1,847 0 0 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7
31 2024 9–15 37.5% #109 1,791 0 0 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7
32 2025 17–22 43.6% #80 1,768 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2026 12–13 48.0% #103 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Julia Goerges
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2013 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2022 14 15 29 48.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 2024 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2025 11 14 25 44.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 8 5 13 61.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 118 142 260 45.4% 45 57 102 44.1% 29 28 57 50.9% — — — — — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 388/420 of Ajla Tomljanovic's and 524/562 of Julia Goerges's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Julia Goerges
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 1/1 1.0 7.0 58.7% 61.4% 35.5% 50.0% 66.7% 50.7% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 4/4 2.5 4.3 56.4% 63.8% 45.0% 54.7% 49.3% 55.4% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6/6 3.0 4.7 56.9% 62.3% 39.8% 53.5% 54.9% 52.7% 48.2% 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7%
19 2012 1/1 0.0 8.0 54.2% 53.8% 27.3% 25.0% 44.4% 41.7% 42.6% 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2%
20 2013 11/14 4.5 4.5 56.5% 64.4% 45.5% 54.6% 49.4% 56.3% 44.4% 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4%
21 2014 32/37 4.2 4.3 56.7% 68.6% 43.3% 54.3% 46.9% 57.7% 41.4% 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3%
22 2015 33/39 4.1 4.3 62.9% 64.1% 48.0% 47.9% 47.0% 58.1% 39.9% 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2%
23 2016 2/2 2.0 5.0 54.1% 51.0% 30.3% 57.2% 70.8% 41.5% 43.0% 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6%
24 2017 15/15 2.1 5.7 58.1% 61.2% 36.9% 45.7% 39.5% 50.7% 41.8% 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0%
25 2018 41/41 3.4 4.9 58.4% 64.1% 43.8% 46.4% 51.9% 55.6% 44.1% 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5%
26 2019 53/54 3.5 4.3 57.9% 66.8% 41.5% 49.1% 46.9% 56.3% 44.0% 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7%
27 2020 16/16 3.3 4.3 55.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.0% 40.7% 56.3% 40.8% 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6%
28 2021 44/46 2.5 4.0 61.8% 64.4% 45.8% 55.9% 46.4% 57.2% 43.6% 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7%
29 2022 52/52 2.6 4.2 62.5% 64.6% 43.8% 48.1% 52.0% 56.8% 44.1% 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5%
30 2023 2/3 3.0 5.0 65.3% 62.9% 47.1% 43.8% 48.0% 57.5% 43.1% 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8%
31 2024 22/24 2.9 7.5 64.1% 62.8% 38.0% 50.7% 40.5% 53.9% 42.4% 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5%
32 2025 28/39 2.2 5.6 65.8% 61.9% 42.1% 49.1% 51.2% 55.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 25/26 1.9 5.6 67.4% 63.3% 43.7% 54.1% 53.1% 56.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 388/420 3.0 4.8 60.7% 64.4% 43.3% 50.2% 48.3% 56.1% 43.1% — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Julia Goerges
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2009 1484 97.7 -3.11 -1.39 0.579 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1465 98.9 -2.42 -2.23 0.863 47.3% +22 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1436 104.6 -1.59 +0.58 1.019 50.4% +18 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.07 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18
19 2012 1421 96.4 -2.81 -3.22 0.731 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.66
20 2013 1524 117.9 -0.54 -0.01 1.015 50.1% +16 — +14 50.0% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 3–0 (100%) — 0.00 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.08
21 2014 1588 121.5 +0.93 -1.84 0.978 49.5% -16 +10 — 48.2% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.94 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.65
22 2015 1605 119.3 -0.59 -1.44 0.953 49.0% -12 +8 -87 45.1% -0.46 8–5 (62%) 12–3 (80%) — +0.57 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -1.13
23 2016 1581 102.8 -1.21 +0.88 0.734 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) — -0.26
24 2017 1571 112.5 -3.78 +0.47 0.848 46.2% +16 -10 — 42.4% -0.94 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.62 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.42
25 2018 1714 128.3 -0.28 +0.61 0.992 49.8% -20 -131 -150 51.0% +0.03 12–8 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.01
26 2019 1654 138.3 -0.07 +1.07 1.005 50.1% +8 -20 -47 50.0% +0.06 6–12 (33%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.88 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.01
27 2020 1615 130.7 +0.18 -1.12 0.935 48.5% +33 -43 — 36.8% -0.79 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.53 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.80
28 2021 1779 141.3 +0.91 +0.76 1.019 50.3% -67 -93 -32 52.0% +0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.37 2017 1893 143.8 +5.05 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.01
29 2022 1867 144.0 +0.10 +1.33 1.021 50.4% -31 -149 -23 53.0% +0.16 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.02 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.46
30 2023 1848 99.8 -0.66 +1.44 1.016 50.2% -57 — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.22 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.72
31 2024 1792 122.8 -1.50 -0.80 0.920 48.1% -16 -35 +106 41.1% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.89 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.07
32 2025 1769 134.0 -0.96 +0.30 0.968 49.2% -15 -12 +77 46.2% -0.34 8–9 (47%) 9–1 (90%) — -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1715 134.6 -0.11 +1.24 1.056 51.2% +99 -104 +125 50.0% +0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 136.5 -0.29 +0.21 0.982 49.6% -8 -55 -5 47.6% -0.20 75–88 (46%) 63–57 (53%) 103.1 -0.83 — 1945 141.6 +3.69 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.