H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-2
Julia Goerges holds a 2–1 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Doha third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2019* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-2 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2017* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-2 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2013* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ajla Tomljanovic | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |