H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Renata Zarazua H2H: 2-1
Ajla Tomljanovic holds a 2–1 lead over Renata Zarazua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ajla Tomljanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2025 Monterrey third round 4-6 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 28
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2025 | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2021* | Charleston 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-1 6-1 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2018* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Zarazua | 1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renata Zarazua | #83 | #51 | 1,063 | 1,746 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #135 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #368 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #83 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |