H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Viktorija Golubic H2H: 0-1
Viktorija Golubic holds a 1–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Viktorija Golubic won the 2022 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2022* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Viktorija Golubic | 6-2 7-6(6) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ajla Tomljanovic | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |