H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Aleksandra Krunic vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 0-1
Maryna Zanevska holds a 1–0 lead over Aleksandra Krunic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maryna Zanevska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maryna Zanevska won the 2013 Linz third round 7-5 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2013* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maryna Zanevska | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | Aleksandra Krunic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aleksandra Krunic | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |