H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Aleksandra Krunic holds a 1–0 lead over Richel Hogenkamp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2017 Tashkent round of 32 7-6(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Krunic | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data | Sep 28, 2017* | R32 | Tashkent | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,581 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aleksandra Krunic | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #144 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,603 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Aleksandra Krunic | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2015 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2017 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2018 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2017 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2019 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 41 | 69 | 110 | 37.3% | 33 | 39 | 72 | 45.8% | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | — | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Aleksandra Krunic | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2011 | 2/4 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 64.4% | 78.7% | 70.1% | 50.0% | 58.3% | 75.8% | 52.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 3/3 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 48.1% | 63.1% | 40.4% | 51.5% | 68.5% | 51.0% | 50.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 4/4 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 48.9% | 59.7% | 50.2% | 45.6% | 42.5% | 54.7% | 42.6% | 2012 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 48.8% | 65.9% | 48.9% | 56.3% | 43.2% | 57.0% | 36.8% |
| 21 | 2014 | 9/11 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 56.7% | 64.0% | 45.1% | 44.4% | 49.5% | 55.7% | 39.9% | 2013 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 6.3 | 57.2% | 55.4% | 46.8% | 57.9% | 78.0% | 52.0% | 45.5% |
| 22 | 2015 | 23/31 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 57.1% | 60.9% | 48.4% | 49.1% | 45.7% | 54.9% | 37.5% | 2014 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 64.9% | 56.6% | 37.3% | 55.0% | 65.3% | 50.3% | 48.5% |
| 23 | 2016 | 15/16 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 63.0% | 58.0% | 43.8% | 35.6% | 38.2% | 52.8% | 42.1% | 2015 | 8/9 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 59.2% | 60.5% | 48.0% | 55.2% | 51.4% | 55.8% | 34.4% |
| 24 | 2017 | 32/33 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 63.6% | 64.5% | 50.3% | 51.1% | 51.6% | 59.5% | 48.5% | 2016 | 6/6 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 55.6% | 63.8% | 49.0% | 61.8% | 57.0% | 57.1% | 45.2% |
| 25 | 2018 | 40/43 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 63.4% | 61.4% | 49.2% | 52.9% | 39.9% | 56.5% | 43.2% | 2017 | 13/13 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 59.1% | 62.5% | 49.4% | 47.9% | 42.7% | 57.2% | 39.2% |
| 26 | 2019 | 19/19 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 63.0% | 56.1% | 47.8% | 53.8% | 36.9% | 52.9% | 39.4% | 2018 | 5/5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 55.4% | 55.2% | 40.6% | 47.6% | 31.3% | 48.4% | 34.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 61.5% | 54.2% | 43.3% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 43.3% |
| 28 | 2021 | 12/12 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 57.1% | 64.4% | 50.9% | 42.3% | 67.7% | 58.8% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 19/19 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 58.8% | 62.4% | 50.4% | 58.2% | 48.6% | 57.7% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 9/9 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 61.6% | 55.9% | 46.5% | 47.2% | 47.4% | 52.4% | 40.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 187/207 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 60.8% | 61.4% | 48.7% | 49.8% | 46.4% | 56.3% | 43.0% | — | 40/42 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 57.8% | 60.5% | 47.0% | 53.0% | 49.0% | 54.9% | 39.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Aleksandra Krunic | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1504 | 105.6 | +1.42 | +0.02 | 2.172 | 63.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | — | — | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 1526 | 101.6 | -1.43 | +0.94 | 1.036 | 51.0% | +12 | — | — | 62.5% | +1.00 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1463 | 96.7 | -1.74 | -1.39 | 0.941 | 48.2% | +24 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.37 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +0.48 | 2012 | 1513 | 105.3 | +0.72 | -1.37 | 0.857 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1524 | 119.6 | -0.18 | -0.41 | 0.902 | 48.4% | +2 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.46 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | 2013 | 1525 | 101.1 | -1.26 | -0.60 | 0.947 | 49.5% | — | +62 | — | 44.4% | -0.45 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1543 | 109.3 | -2.03 | -3.19 | 0.832 | 46.3% | -35 | -23 | +122 | 40.0% | -0.91 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.3 | +0.06 | 2014 | 1530 | 104.8 | -1.97 | -1.72 | 0.975 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1595 | 118.6 | -1.15 | -1.51 | 0.893 | 47.6% | -54 | +15 | +43 | 27.3% | -1.30 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -1.00 | 2015 | 1496 | 108.3 | -1.68 | -2.17 | 0.778 | 45.4% | -26 | +70 | — | 26.3% | -1.68 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.22 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1753 | 130.9 | +2.13 | +3.51 | 1.197 | 53.9% | -68 | +21 | — | 59.2% | +0.68 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | +0.88 | 2016 | 1549 | 112.0 | -0.08 | +0.20 | 1.052 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 25 | 2018 | 1714 | 131.0 | -0.44 | -0.20 | 0.992 | 49.5% | -69 | +26 | +49 | 44.3% | -0.43 | 8–5 (62%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.6 | -0.57 | 2017 | 1538 | 106.6 | +0.40 | -2.44 | 0.917 | 48.4% | -45 | — | +57 | 39.3% | -0.64 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.12 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1557 | 107.2 | -2.43 | -3.32 | 0.836 | 46.4% | -17 | +146 | — | 27.5% | -1.58 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | -0.16 | 2018 | 1514 | 95.9 | -2.74 | -3.00 | 0.659 | 41.5% | — | +56 | — | 9.1% | -3.36 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1479 | 104.6 | +0.93 | +3.09 | 0.867 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1644 | 126.9 | +1.13 | +0.71 | 1.067 | 51.3% | -4 | +67 | — | 43.5% | +0.17 | 1–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.04 | 2020 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 1635 | 120.3 | +0.48 | +1.43 | 1.042 | 50.8% | -31 | +63 | +22 | 48.8% | -0.05 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.2 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1633 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1468 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 1604 | 109.4 | -1.80 | -1.53 | 0.858 | 46.5% | -21 | — | +83 | 30.4% | -1.48 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.5 | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1566 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 1551 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1772 | 124.4 | -0.34 | -0.21 | 0.983 | 49.6% | -39 | +40 | +64 | 42.5% | -0.51 | 23–30 (43%) | 18–19 (49%) | 97.4 | -0.11 | — | 1581 | 108.2 | -0.69 | -1.69 | 0.874 | 47.4% | -39 | +63 | +57 | 35.9% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–8 (0%) | 92.3 | -1.95 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 8, 2018 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 29, 2022 | H2H |
| Lesia Tsurenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 30, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 16, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Lara Arruabarrena | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Madison Brengle | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2017 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |