H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Aleksandra Wozniak vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 1-0
Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Pous-Tio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2007 Fes third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2007* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-4 6-1 | Laura Pous-Tio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Laura Pous-Tio | #776 | #72 | 930 | 1,621 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aleksandra Wozniak | Laura Pous-Tio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #75 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |