H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexandra Dulgheru vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 2-1
Alexandra Dulgheru holds a 2–1 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Alexandra Dulgheru leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2016 Rabat third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2016* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-4 6-2 | Alexandra Dulgheru | Match data |
| May 15, 2015* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Alexandra Dulgheru | 6-4 6-3 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2010* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alexandra Dulgheru | 6-3 6-0 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Dulgheru | #958 | #26 | 2,160 | 1,831 | 81 | 106 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Dulgheru | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #65 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #233 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,549 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |