H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandra Dulgheru vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-0
Alexandra Dulgheru holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandra Dulgheru leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexandra Dulgheru won the 2016 Auckland fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alexandra Dulgheru | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Dulgheru | #958 | #26 | 2,160 | 1,831 | 81 | 106 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Dulgheru | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #65 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #233 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,549 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |