H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandra Dulgheru vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-1
Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Alexandra Dulgheru in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2011 Dubai third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-4 6-2 | Alexandra Dulgheru | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Dulgheru | #958 | #26 | 2,160 | 1,831 | 81 | 106 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Dulgheru | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2009 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #65 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #233 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,549 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |