H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 0-2
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2023 Miami second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-3 6-2 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
| Nov 14, 2020* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-3 6-1 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |