H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2022 Indian Wells Open first round 6-4 5-0 (ret.).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-4 6-4 | Camila Osorio | Match data | Oct 12, 2025 | Q2 | Ningbo Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-4 5-0 (ret.) | Camila Osorio | Match data | Mar 11, 2022* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-0 6-4 | Camila Osorio | Match data | Oct 8, 2021* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-2 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data | May 21, 2021* | QF | Belgrade | WTA 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #112 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,893 | 160 | 176 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Osorio | #68 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,824 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #62 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #112 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2014 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2015 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2023 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2016 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2024 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 23 | 2017 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2025 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2026 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2019 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 106 | 113 | 219 | 48.4% | 38 | 43 | 81 | 46.9% | 16 | 20 | 36 | 44.4% | — | 48 | 60 | 108 | 44.4% | 52 | 25 | 77 | 67.5% | 5 | 14 | 19 | 26.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 313/337 of Aliaksandra Sasnovich's and 187/206 of Camila Osorio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 61.9% | 32.1% | 58.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 36.9% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 57.8% | 62.9% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 41.6% | 56.3% | 47.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 61.1% | 38.4% | 51.1% | 49.0% | 52.7% | 48.0% |
| 20 | 2014 | 5/5 | 2.4 | 5.6 | 53.8% | 62.2% | 48.4% | 52.7% | 33.8% | 56.2% | 35.5% | 2022 | 30/31 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.6% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 44.0% | 53.3% | 44.7% |
| 21 | 2015 | 3/12 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 69.0% | 59.6% | 38.4% | 44.4% | 40.2% | 53.7% | 40.0% | 2023 | 32/32 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 64.2% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 50.7% | 40.1% | 53.9% | 44.9% |
| 22 | 2016 | 19/19 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 61.1% | 56.0% | 37.9% | 45.7% | 50.7% | 48.9% | 43.4% | 2024 | 32/35 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 45.4% |
| 23 | 2017 | 25/25 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 62.7% | 61.0% | 43.6% | 45.7% | 45.7% | 54.7% | 43.2% | 2025 | 26/39 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 62.6% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 54.1% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 44.7% |
| 24 | 2018 | 45/46 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 63.1% | 64.4% | 45.2% | 48.1% | 42.9% | 57.3% | 43.0% | 2026 | 34/35 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 64.1% | 62.1% | 44.4% | 50.6% | 51.4% | 55.5% | 45.5% |
| 25 | 2019 | 32/36 | 2.7 | 4.3 | 61.1% | 61.6% | 43.4% | 46.8% | 42.6% | 54.2% | 42.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 19/19 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.2% | 61.3% | 48.0% | 57.3% | 50.1% | 56.2% | 45.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 38/38 | 1.8 | 4.0 | 65.4% | 59.3% | 44.0% | 52.0% | 51.0% | 53.8% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 44/46 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 68.1% | 62.0% | 45.3% | 52.8% | 53.1% | 56.5% | 45.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 37/37 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 66.6% | 59.4% | 43.4% | 50.5% | 50.2% | 54.0% | 43.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 15/15 | 1.7 | 6.6 | 64.0% | 58.1% | 42.6% | 52.4% | 56.6% | 52.3% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 11/17 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 59.3% | 63.4% | 38.4% | 48.7% | 34.7% | 53.2% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 20/22 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 64.0% | 61.5% | 44.4% | 56.6% | 52.5% | 55.5% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 313/337 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 64.2% | 61.0% | 43.8% | 50.4% | 48.1% | 54.7% | 43.8% | — | 187/206 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 64.5% | 60.6% | 41.3% | 51.0% | 47.0% | 53.7% | 45.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1483 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1466 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1454 | 96.2 | -0.76 | -2.99 | 0.738 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1488 | 103.3 | +0.83 | +0.51 | 1.091 | 51.8% | — | +17 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1699 | 120.1 | -2.66 | +3.25 | 1.014 | 50.4% | -108 | +13 | -63 | 52.3% | +0.08 | 7–0 (100%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.0 | -0.69 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1491 | 100.7 | -0.24 | -3.47 | 0.810 | 46.0% | +19 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.73 | 2022 | 1689 | 126.5 | -2.72 | +0.83 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -8 | +34 | -184 | 48.3% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.1 | +0.85 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1584 | 121.6 | +0.12 | -0.51 | 0.864 | 47.1% | +6 | — | — | 48.0% | +0.08 | 3–0 (100%) | — | — | -0.56 | 2023 | 1731 | 132.3 | -1.96 | +1.86 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -54 | +87 | -241 | 52.9% | -0.04 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.3 | -2.02 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1562 | 112.6 | -4.71 | -0.25 | 0.849 | 46.2% | +3 | -67 | — | 37.8% | -1.33 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.9 | -0.86 | 2024 | 1757 | 132.8 | -3.36 | +0.94 | 0.954 | 49.1% | -66 | +105 | -187 | 53.8% | +0.01 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 100.9 | -0.70 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1639 | 120.0 | -1.00 | +0.47 | 0.955 | 48.8% | +16 | -144 | -70 | 49.2% | -0.29 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.1 | -1.02 | 2025 | 1710 | 136.5 | -2.43 | +1.11 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -15 | +115 | — | 52.9% | +0.28 | 9–6 (60%) | 2–5 (29%) | 100.0 | -0.15 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1819 | 141.3 | +0.58 | +0.57 | 1.009 | 50.1% | -2 | -272 | -174 | 55.0% | +0.07 | 9–10 (47%) | 11–5 (69%) | 104.2 | -2.03 | 2026 | 1740 | 143.9 | -1.23 | +2.73 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +8 | +72 | — | 49.4% | +0.22 | 5–8 (38%) | 3–8 (27%) | 94.7 | -1.51 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1671 | 137.5 | -1.55 | -0.39 | 0.918 | 47.9% | +40 | -131 | -65 | 41.4% | -0.78 | 7–8 (47%) | 0–1 | — | -1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 1734 | 129.8 | -0.26 | +1.90 | 1.048 | 51.3% | -20 | -54 | — | 50.0% | +0.48 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–6 (14%) | 98.5 | +0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 1770 | 135.2 | -1.45 | +2.11 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +1 | -87 | -126 | 48.8% | +0.05 | 8–8 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 99.1 | -0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 1772 | 144.3 | -0.10 | +2.90 | 1.055 | 51.2% | +35 | +15 | -119 | 56.1% | +0.50 | 9–10 (47%) | 9–6 (60%) | 102.2 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 1734 | 132.8 | -2.40 | +1.49 | 0.943 | 48.7% | +2 | -49 | -28 | 44.7% | -0.48 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.5 | -2.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 1712 | 122.4 | -2.54 | +0.99 | 0.936 | 48.6% | -70 | +31 | — | 40.6% | -0.56 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.5 | -0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 1694 | 127.8 | -1.15 | -0.74 | 0.876 | 46.8% | -38 | +29 | +83 | 37.5% | -0.82 | 5–1 (83%) | 3–5 (38%) | 102.8 | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1797 | 139.1 | -0.50 | +0.51 | 0.986 | 49.9% | +24 | — | — | 39.6% | -0.38 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.2 | -2.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1894 | 137.3 | -1.13 | +1.01 | 0.968 | 49.3% | +10 | -72 | -74 | 47.2% | -0.23 | 66–62 (52%) | 39–46 (46%) | 101.7 | -3.10 | — | 1824 | 136.5 | -2.31 | +1.76 | 0.983 | 49.6% | -33 | +71 | -164 | 51.7% | +0.05 | 36–29 (55%) | 32–32 (50%) | 104.9 | -1.99 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Oct 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 7 | 1 | 8 | Jul 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 4 | 3 | 7 | Feb 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 20, 2023 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 19, 2020 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |