H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 0-1
Carina Witthoeft holds a 1–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2016 Miami first round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Carina Witthoeft | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |