H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alisa Kleybanova vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 2-0
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 2–0 lead over Aleksandra Wozniak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2009 Toronto second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2009* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-4 6-4 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| May 1, 2008* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-2 6-3 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alisa Kleybanova | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |