H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alisa Kleybanova vs Melinda Czink H2H: 0-1
Melinda Czink holds a 1–0 lead over Alisa Kleybanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2009 Stanford third round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2009* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 6-0 7-5 | Alisa Kleybanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alisa Kleybanova | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |