H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 0-4
Maria Sharapova holds a 4–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Sharapova won the 2019 Cincinnati second round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 7-6(4) | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2018* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Maria Sharapova | 6-3 6-0 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2010* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Maria Sharapova | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 22 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 27 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 28 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| 30 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |