H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Nadiia Kichenok H2H: 2-0
Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 2–0 lead over Nadiia Kichenok in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2014 Birmingham third round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Nadiia Kichenok | Match data |
| Mar 18, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Nadiia Kichenok | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Nadiia Kichenok | #1,040 | #100 | 663 | 1,517 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Nadiia Kichenok | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |