H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 1-5

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 5–1 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2017 Madrid third round 2-6 7-6(9) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Riske-Amritraj
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2017* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #9 2-6 7-6(9) 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #39 Match data
Oct 15, 2016* Tianjin WTA 250 SF Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #56 6-4 5-7 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 Match data
Aug 18, 2016* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 3-6 6-3 6-1 Alison Riske-Amritraj #70 Match data
Mar 25, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 6-2 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #43 Match data
Jan 5, 2012* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #19 6-3 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #136 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #26 6-3 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 — — — — — — — 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 — — — — — — — 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 — — — — — — — 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18