H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Alizé Cornet vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 4-2

Alizé Cornet holds a 4–2 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Alizé Cornet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2016 Montreal second round 7-6(1) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alizé Cornet
FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2021 Rome WTA 1000 Q2 Q Clay Alizé Cornet #60 6-2 7-6(5) Andrea Petkovic #109 Match data
Aug 10, 2019 Cincinnati WTA 1000 Q1 Q Hard Andrea Petkovic #87 7-6(5) 6-3 Alizé Cornet #53 Match data
Jul 27, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Andrea Petkovic #41 7-6(1) 6-3 Alizé Cornet #49 Match data
Mar 19, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alizé Cornet #22 6-2 6-7(0) 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #37 Match data
Feb 1, 2014* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Alizé Cornet #25 7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #39 Match data
Jul 29, 2013 Washington WTA 250 SF Hard Andrea Petkovic #64 7-5 6-3 Alizé Cornet #31 Match data
Jul 23, 2010* Bad Gastein WTA 250 R16 Clay Alizé Cornet #81 6-2 7-5 Andrea Petkovic #35 Match data
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Alizé Cornet #16 6-1 6-0 Andrea Petkovic #385 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alizé Cornet Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1
22 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1
23 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2
24 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2
25 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2
26 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5
27 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6
28 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6
29 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6
30 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6
31 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6
32 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6
33 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7
34 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6 — — — — — — —