H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Alizé Cornet vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-2

Alizé Cornet and Tamira Paszek are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Alizé Cornet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2012 London Olympics first round 7-6(7) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alizé Cornet
France Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alizé Cornet #47 7-6(7) 6-4 Tamira Paszek Match data Jul 30, 2012* R64 London Olympics Olympics Grass
Tamira Paszek 6-2 6-1 Alizé Cornet #60 Match data Jun 29, 2012* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Alizé Cornet #81 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 Tamira Paszek Match data Jul 15, 2010* R32 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tamira Paszek 6-1 2-6 6-3 Alizé Cornet #49 Match data Mar 25, 2008* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 379 361 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alizé Cornet Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,509 0 0 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2008 36–22 62.1% #16 1,781 0 1 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,662 0 1 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,561 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2012 22–20 52.4% #44 1,640 0 2 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,791 0 4 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,631 0 4 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2016 22–21 51.2% #41 1,704 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2017 24–22 52.2% #38 1,754 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #45 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2019 24–20 54.5% #59 1,698 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,771 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2021 24–24 50.0% #61 1,744 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,752 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2023 12–18 40.0% #117 1,671 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,607 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,554 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alizé Cornet Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2009 12 13 25 48.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2011 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 17 15 32 53.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 28 16 44 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 13 11 24 54.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 16 15 31 51.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 16 16 32 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 217 208 425 51.1% 122 107 229 53.3% 33 38 71 46.5% 7 8 15 46.7% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 665/741 of Alizé Cornet's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alizé Cornet Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2005 2/2 1.5 1.5 58.6% 56.3% 41.2% 45.0% 34.8% 49.8% 41.9% 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 2006 3/3 1.3 6.7 58.0% 57.6% 45.5% 62.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.3% 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 2007 8/17 1.4 4.8 57.0% 61.7% 36.5% 46.8% 39.4% 50.8% 47.0% 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2008 48/58 2.4 3.1 59.4% 64.4% 43.4% 55.4% 56.2% 55.9% 47.1% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2009 43/44 1.9 4.9 55.0% 59.8% 44.5% 47.9% 44.7% 52.9% 45.0% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2010 32/37 2.3 3.6 60.6% 63.2% 40.3% 52.0% 47.3% 54.3% 45.9% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2011 26/27 2.2 5.1 59.0% 59.3% 40.6% 51.5% 55.2% 51.6% 45.2% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2012 36/42 1.2 4.7 61.0% 60.7% 40.8% 49.1% 53.9% 52.8% 48.2% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2013 51/62 2.1 4.7 60.5% 61.5% 44.5% 54.0% 52.2% 54.8% 47.0% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2014 52/61 1.5 5.0 62.9% 63.4% 45.2% 49.6% 51.5% 56.5% 47.0% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2015 42/49 1.8 5.9 65.7% 62.3% 48.9% 48.9% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2016 35/43 1.5 5.5 63.1% 62.7% 41.0% 58.8% 51.0% 54.5% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 41/46 1.0 4.3 64.3% 59.3% 41.1% 52.6% 51.7% 52.9% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 45/47 1.2 3.6 65.2% 60.9% 45.3% 52.0% 50.6% 55.5% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 44/44 1.5 3.2 63.1% 63.5% 46.3% 51.5% 50.0% 57.1% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 22/22 2.2 4.7 62.6% 66.3% 42.6% 56.0% 51.4% 57.5% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 47/49 1.6 4.5 63.0% 62.7% 42.0% 52.0% 51.8% 54.8% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 49/49 2.2 4.6 58.7% 65.5% 45.2% 51.7% 48.8% 57.2% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 30/30 1.5 5.3 63.6% 61.9% 42.7% 52.0% 54.8% 54.8% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 1.4 5.6 58.6% 57.6% 36.6% 52.0% 36.2% 48.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 0.0 5.0 50.9% 51.9% 23.1% 0.0% 16.7% 37.7% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 665/741 1.7 4.5 61.6% 62.2% 43.5% 51.9% 50.9% 55.0% 45.7% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alizé Cornet Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 2005 1516 106.6 -1.79 +1.78 0.836 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.03 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 2006 1510 102.3 -1.61 -2.20 0.893 47.7% — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.29 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 2007 1570 120.8 -1.99 +1.24 0.957 48.9% -48 +43 — 48.7% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.22 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2008 1782 146.7 +0.62 +3.01 1.067 51.6% -112 +74 — 59.5% +0.78 11–8 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.5 -0.33 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2009 1663 128.7 -2.23 +1.23 0.955 49.3% +16 +59 — 45.1% -0.31 8–6 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.18 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2010 1611 121.0 -1.21 +1.16 1.003 50.1% +7 +76 — 48.8% +0.02 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.69 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2011 1562 123.0 -3.16 +0.65 0.933 48.4% +57 +60 — 39.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 -1.01 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2012 1640 126.5 -2.48 +2.74 1.023 50.5% -34 +105 -109 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 +0.06 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2013 1731 137.4 -0.53 +2.45 1.040 51.0% -10 +13 -220 54.9% +0.32 12–10 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.1 +0.65 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2014 1792 145.4 +0.93 +3.61 1.080 51.7% +29 -135 -154 54.2% +0.46 17–9 (65%) 8–12 (40%) 104.0 -0.76 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2015 1631 126.7 -0.36 +1.69 1.041 50.7% +22 +52 -29 47.9% -0.03 10–11 (48%) 1–7 (13%) 91.6 +1.81 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2016 1704 131.6 -0.75 +1.42 0.982 49.8% +19 -93 -99 48.9% +0.14 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1755 137.4 -2.79 +3.62 1.006 50.0% +35 -111 -216 51.0% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1689 134.8 -1.25 +1.50 1.004 50.1% -15 +85 -137 48.1% -0.04 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1699 130.0 +0.27 +3.19 1.115 52.5% -21 +47 -95 56.7% +0.59 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1771 138.5 +0.58 +1.50 1.044 51.5% +8 -35 — 55.3% +0.64 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1744 132.4 -0.78 +2.82 1.016 50.4% +5 -128 -57 48.1% +0.06 10–4 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 106.9 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1753 141.3 +0.38 +1.27 1.028 50.7% -22 -126 +32 55.3% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1671 113.6 -1.47 -0.64 0.957 49.0% -36 -30 +86 39.4% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 98.9 +0.47 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1607 107.6 -3.28 -1.77 0.763 44.3% -37 +7 — 16.7% -2.50 1–1 — — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1554 97.7 +1.43 +0.15 0.615 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1884 138.4 -0.83 +2.02 1.016 50.4% -1 +21 -65 50.3% +0.12 127–114 (53%) 74–76 (49%) 101.7 0.00 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.