H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Alona Bondarenko vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 3-3

Alona Bondarenko and Gisela Dulko are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 2–1 on clay, while Gisela Dulko leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2010 Miami second round 7-5 6-2.

UKR Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Gisela Dulko #37 7-5 6-2 Alona Bondarenko #24 Match data
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Gisela Dulko #40 6-4 6-0 Alona Bondarenko #32 Match data
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Alona Bondarenko #21 6-4 6-3 Gisela Dulko #42 Match data
Apr 4, 2007* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Alona Bondarenko #38 6-2 6-3 Gisela Dulko #52 Match data
Apr 5, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Alona Bondarenko #81 6-0 6-1 Gisela Dulko #30 Match data
Apr 29, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Gisela Dulko #39 6-2 6-3 Alona Bondarenko #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alona Bondarenko #1,151 #19 2,020 1,872 154 143 51.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alona Bondarenko Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0
18 2003 0–2 0.0% #187 1,472 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #110 1,482 0 0 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0
20 2005 13–16 44.8% #79 1,528 0 0 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0
21 2006 24–22 52.2% #32 1,689 0 1 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2007 33–24 57.9% #21 1,765 0 1 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2
23 2008 25–20 55.6% #33 1,785 0 1 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3
24 2009 30–25 54.5% #32 1,781 0 1 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3
25 2010 24–19 55.8% #36 1,732 0 2 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3
26 2011 4–14 22.2% #257 1,565 0 2 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4