H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alycia Moulton vs Elise Burgin H2H: 2-1
Alycia Moulton holds a 2–1 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alycia Moulton leads 2–0 on carpet, while Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alycia Moulton won the 1986 Chicago third round 6-2 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1986* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Alycia Moulton | 6-2 6-7 6-1 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1986* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Alycia Moulton | 6-7 6-3 6-0 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1982* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Alycia Moulton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alycia Moulton | #253 | #18 | 22 | 1,923 | 145 | 128 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alycia Moulton | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 37–23 | 61.7% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #19 | 1,856 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #20 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |