H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 2-0

Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2021 Bad Homburg Open second round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Anisimova
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Anisimova #81 6-1 7-5 Andrea Petkovic #130 Match data Jun 24, 2021* R16 Bad Homburg Open WTA 250 Grass
Amanda Anisimova #73 6-4 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #67 Match data Mar 21, 2019* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,125 179 107 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 23–13 63.9% #24 1,765 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,778 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,892 0 2 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,114 0 4 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2
24 2026 23–12 65.7% #10 2,011 0 4 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Andrea Petkovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 9 8 17 52.9% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2026 18 9 27 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 112 70 182 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Andrea Petkovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 35/36 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0%
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5%
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2%
24 2026 31/36 3.5 4.0 64.0% 68.9% 50.4% 47.4% 54.2% 62.3% 47.2% 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5%
Career — 258/290 2.6 3.8 64.6% 65.1% 48.7% 53.7% 50.1% 59.2% 45.3% — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Andrea Petkovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.25 -2.07 0.921 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +12 — — 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1765 138.6 +0.98 +4.05 1.126 52.6% -48 -32 -110 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) 104.3 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 1778 138.0 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -19 -30 — 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 -0.42 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +8 -45 -146 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 92.9 -1.37 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06
20 2022 1927 151.1 +2.94 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -73 -6 -126 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) 110.1 -2.09 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24
21 2023 1794 127.1 -0.58 -0.40 0.923 48.2% -29 — — 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67
22 2024 1892 146.4 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +36 -108 — 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.8 -1.57 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09
23 2025 2115 162.2 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +10 -238 -59 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) 113.5 -0.29 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95
24 2026 2012 157.7 +4.35 +4.19 1.250 54.7% +43 -142 +2 60.8% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 +1.28 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76
Career — 2126 156.9 +2.36 +2.51 1.111 52.2% -1 -68 -83 61.2% +0.77 49–44 (53%) 32–25 (56%) 106.2 -1.30 — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.