H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Donna Vekic H2H: 2-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 6-4 6-1 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |