H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Irina-Camelia Begu H2H: 2-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Irina-Camelia Begu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Melbourne 2 quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2022* | Melbourne 2 | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Irina-Camelia Begu | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Irina-Camelia Begu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | #204 | #22 | 1,925 | 1,886 | 249 | 234 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Irina-Camelia Begu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #41 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #29 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #34 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #75 | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #144 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,726 | 0 | 6 |