H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Jasmine Paolini H2H: 2-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Beijing quarterfinal 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| May 20, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 |