H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Jennifer Brady H2H: 0-1
Jennifer Brady holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jennifer Brady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Brady won the 2019 Beijing second round 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Jennifer Brady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |