H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 10:36 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 1-0

Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2026 Queen's Club Championships second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Anisimova
United States Age 24 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Anisimova #5 6-1 6-3 Laura Siegemund #44 Match data Jun 10, 2026 R16 Queen's Club Championships WTA 500 Grass

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,126 174 104 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Laura Siegemund #88 #27 1,630 1,854 146 154 48.7% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Laura Siegemund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 23–12 65.7% #24 1,772 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,780 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,893 0 2 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,115 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 2026 18–10 64.3% #10 1,995 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 14–12 53.8% #69 1,800 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,695 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,787 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,730 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,654 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,802 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,740 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,804 0 2
38 — — — — — — — 2026 8–12 40.0% #88 1,749 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Laura Siegemund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 9 7 16 56.3% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 13 4 17 76.5% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 107 67 174 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% — 66 83 149 44.3% 70 56 126 55.6% 10 15 25 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 251/283 of Amanda Anisimova's and 279/302 of Laura Siegemund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Laura Siegemund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 35/35 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 24/30 3.3 4.1 65.5% 69.5% 48.7% 45.6% 54.3% 62.3% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 26/26 1.0 4.7 68.5% 58.8% 42.6% 56.7% 44.6% 53.6% 46.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.1% 59.4% 46.6% 52.9% 40.6% 56.3% 42.3%
Career — 251/283 2.5 3.8 64.8% 65.1% 48.4% 53.7% 50.0% 59.1% 45.2% — 279/302 0.9 3.5 70.9% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.8% 55.4% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Laura Siegemund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.24 -2.08 0.921 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +13 — — 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1772 138.4 +1.04 +4.16 1.126 52.6% -37 -40 -114 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 1781 137.9 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -14 -34 — 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +12 -46 -145 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) -1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 1927 151.0 +2.95 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -72 -5 -123 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) -2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 1794 127.2 -0.60 -0.37 0.923 48.2% -28 — — 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2024 1893 146.7 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +37 -109 — 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) -1.78 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — +0.13
23 2025 2115 162.4 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +11 -235 -53 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 1996 152.8 +4.25 +3.61 1.244 54.6% +58 -133 +9 59.7% +0.92 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1495 114.7 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 -0.46
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1530 113.6 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +26 +1 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) -0.34
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1747 132.6 +0.57 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -99 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) -0.54
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1800 128.4 -1.78 +3.43 1.010 50.2% -253 +121 — 54.1% +0.16 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) -1.43
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1695 118.7 -0.33 +1.51 1.020 50.5% -151 +86 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 -1.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1668 126.0 +0.25 -0.90 0.946 48.8% -72 +58 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) -0.55
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1788 142.2 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -77 +23 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 -1.06
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1731 132.3 -1.13 -1.08 0.881 47.5% +6 +50 -143 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) -0.27
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1655 117.5 -0.89 -0.49 0.831 46.6% +18 +82 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.94
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1802 135.4 +1.17 -0.26 1.012 50.5% +4 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) -0.71
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1740 133.3 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +20 -19 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) +0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1804 133.5 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -164 -32 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) -0.45
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1749 132.1 +0.39 -0.60 0.968 49.2% -21 -31 -42 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) -0.27
Career — 2126 156.3 +2.30 +2.43 1.107 52.2% +1 -69 -80 61.1% +0.75 47–43 (52%) 32–24 (57%) -1.56 — 1854 137.4 -0.40 +1.03 0.990 49.8% -44 +47 -91 49.1% -0.06 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) -2.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.