H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-1
Amanda Anisimova and Madison Brengle are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2023 Miami first round 7-6(5) 5-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2023* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Madison Brengle | 7-6(5) 5-2 (ret.) | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2022 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Madison Brengle | 7-5 7-6(5) | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2019* | San Jose | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 6-2 | Madison Brengle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Madison Brengle | #210 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,740 | 94 | 151 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |