H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Madison Keys H2H: 1-1
Amanda Anisimova and Madison Keys are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 1–0 on grass, while Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2026 Wimbledon third round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Madison Keys | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2025* | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | QF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Madison Keys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Madison Keys | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 |